Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

9. It is also pointed out by him that the petitioner was not a regular staff of the treasury rather he was only deputed in the aforesaid treasury for a certain period in absence of regular treasury staff.

10. It is further contended by him that at the time of alleged occurrence, it was the practice in the treasury office to pass bills/vouchers without ascertaining allotment order and practice of passing of bills/vouchers after obtaining allotment order was started from 30.1.1996 when famous fodder scam case came to light in the State of Bihar and, therefore, petitioner was not aware about this fact that excess amount was being withdrawn from treasury.