Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Forgery ipc in M. Laxman vs The State Of Telangana And Another on 3 December, 2020Matching Fragments
15. Having regard to the principles governing opening of Rowdy Sheet vis-à-vis right to life and liberty, it is necessary to considered whether by opening rowdy sheet against petitioner, respondent police have violated the mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and whether their decision is supported by reasons warranting requirement to open rowdy sheet.
16. As per the proceedings impugned in the writ petition, it is seen that 7 crimes were registered against the petitioner. In 5 crimes, he is facing trial. The crimes involved include Sections 447 IPC (criminal trespass); 427 IPC (Mischief); 506 IPC (criminal intimidation); 420 IPC (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property); 468 IPC (forgery for purpose of cheating); 471 IPC (using as genuine a forged document); 452 IPC (House trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint); 120-B IPC (criminal conspiracy) and 34 IPC (Act done by several persons in PNR,J furtherance of common intention). This would show that petitioner is in the habit of involving in crimes, disturbing peace and tranquility.