Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(Annexure P/11) issued under the signature of the Respondent no.11 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to submit show cause reply to the effect that she has obtained less than 60 % marks in CTET, therefore, her appointment is liable to be canceled, the aforesaid notifications are contrary to conditions laid down in the Advertisement No.27 of 2023 dated 04.11.2023(Annexure P/1) by which following the procedure, the petitioner has been appointed as School teacher, moreover, the said notifications are in teeth of a letter issued by the the then Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar vide letter no.666 dated 13.07.2021 (Annexure P/14) in which female Patna High Court CWJC No.3887 of 2025 dt.20-03-2025 candidates either of the resident of Bihar or other States have been put under same category, more so the show cause is in contravention of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by which no discrimination can be made on the ground of place of birth or residence.

"2. f"k{kk foHkkx ds vUrxZr fo|ky; v/;kid ds in ij fu;qfDr gsrq vfuok;Z vgZrk fuEuor gksaxh%& ¼i½ Hkkjr dk ukxfjd gksA ¼ii½ fo|ky; v/;kid ds in ij fu;qfDr gsrq jk'Vªh; v/;kid f"k{kk ifj'kn~ }kjk le;≤ ij fu/kkZfjr "kS{kf.kd ,oa iz"kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk /kkfjr djrk gksA fo"ks'k fo|ky; v/;kid ds fy, vgZrk Hkkjrh; iquokZl ifj'kn~ ds vuq:i vuqekU; gksxkA ¼iii½ jkT; ljdkj vFkok dsUnz ljdkj }kjk le;≤ ij vkgwr f"k{kd ik=rk ijh{kk esa mÙkh.kZ gks ;Fkk%& ¼i½ e/; fo|ky; ds v/;kidksa ds fy, CTET Paper-II vFkok BTET Paper-II ¼ii½ ek/;fed fo|ky; ds v/;kidksa fo"ks'k fo|ky; ds v/;kidksa ds fy, STET Paper-I ,oa ¼iii½ mPp ek/;fed fo|ky; ds v/;kidksa ds fy, esa STET Paper-II esa mÙkh.kZ gksaA ijUrq o'kZ 2012 ls iwoZ fu;qDr ,oa dk;Zjr f"k{kd] tks n{krk ijh{kk mÙkh.kZ gksaxs] ds fy, f"k{kd ik=rk ijh{kk esa mÙkh.kZrk vfuok;Z ugha gksxhA  f"k{kk foHkkx ds i=kad 582] fnukad 17-06- 2023 ds vkyksd esa Li'V fd;k tkrk gS fd CTET vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, BTET, 2017 ds fy, ykxw izko/kkuqlkj lkekU; dksfV ds vH;FkhZ dks U;wure 60 izfr"kr vad] fiNM+k oxZ] vR;ar fiNM+k oxZ ,oa lkekU; dksfV dh efgyk mEehnokjksa dks 55 izfr"kr vad ,oa vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr rFkk fu%"kDr dksfV ds mEehnokjksa dks 50 izfr"kr vad ds vk/kkj ij mÙkh.kZ ekuk tk;sxkA fo|ky; v/;kid ds in ij fu;qfDr gsrq jk'Vªh; v/;kid f"k{kk ifj'kn~ }kjk le;≤ ij fu/kkZfjr "kS{kfud ,oa iz"kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk /kkfjr djrk gks ,oa fo"ks'k fo|ky; v/;kid ds fy, Patna High Court CWJC No.3887 of 2025 dt.20-03-2025 vgZrk Hkkjrh; iquokZl ifj'kn~ ds vuq:i vuqekU; gksxk] tks lEizfr fuEuor gS%& ¼A½ fo|ky; v/;kid ds fy, Lukrd dksfV ¼d{kk 6&8½%& e/; fo|ky;ksa esa Lukrd dksfV ¼6&8½ ds fo| ky; v/kid dh fo'k;okj fuEu in gksxksa%& ¼d½ xf.kr ,oa foKku fo|ky; v/;kidA ¼[k½ lkekftd foKku fo|ky; v/;kidA ¼x½ Hkk'kk fo|ky; v/;kidA ¼i½ fu;qfDr gsrq U;wure "kS{kfud ,oa iz"kS{kfud vgZrk fuEuor gksxh% Lukrd ¼ fo"ofo|ky; vuqnku vk;ksx ls ekU;rk izkIr fo"ofo|ky; ls izkIr fMxzh ½ vkSj izkjafHkd f"k{kk esa f}o'khZ; fMIyksek ¼pkgs ftl Hkh uke ls tkuk tkrk gks ½ vFkok de&ls&de 50% vadksa lfgr Lukrd ;k LukrdksRrj rFkk ch0,M0 vFkok U;wure 45% vadksa ds lkFk Lukrd ,oa f"k{kk "kkL= esa ,d o'khZ; Lukrd ¼ch0,M0½ tks bl laca/k esa le;≤ ij tkjh fd;s x;s jk'Vªh; v/;kid f"k{kk ifj'kn~ eku:rk] ekunaM rFkk fdz;kfof/k fofu;eksa ds vuqlkj izkIr fd;k x;k gksA vFkok U;wure 50% vadksa ds lkFk mPprj ek/;fed ¼vFkok blds led{k½ ,oa pkj o'khZ; izkjafHkd f"k{kk "kkL= esas Lukrd ¼ch0,y0,M0½ vFkok U;wure 50% vadksa ds lkFk mPprj ek/;fed ¼vFkok blds led{k½ ,oa pkj o'khZ;

8. The petitioner has claimed that she had applied for Class VI to VIII in Mathematics and Science subject. The petitioner has also claimed that she has all the requisite qualification including the CTET examination qualification certificate and other training certificate as well.

9. It is the admitted fact that the petitioner was appointed for teaching Class VI to VIII, vide Memo No.8440001 dated 23.01.2024. The appointment letter contains declaration of the petitioner that in case the terms and conditions of the appointment is violated or is found incorrect, then in that case, the disciplinary action is required to be taken against her.

ARGUMENT OF PARTIES

11. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had applied for appointment on the post of government school teacher, as per the conditions laid down in Advertisement No.27 of 2023 dated 04.11.2023. The clarificatory letter no.666 dated 13.07.2021 issued by the Director, Primary Education informing that Rule 9

(i) of Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Employment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2012 provides that minimum 50 % women will be appointed and it further clarified that all the reserved female category candidates of the State and outside the State can be appointed. It is further case of the petitioner that there is no description regarding reservation, as per letter no.582 dated 17.06.2023, by which 60% marks is required for general category, 55% marks required for B.C./E.B.C./Female of general category candidate and 50% marks required for the disabled candidates. While the petitioner was working as School Teacher, in the meantime a writ application bearing CWJC No.3270/2024 was filed and after hearing the parties, this Patna High Court CWJC No.3887 of 2025 dt.20-03-2025 Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass order dated 01.04.2024 with a direction to the Director, Secondary Education (respondent no.4) to dispose of the representation within eight weeks. Learned counsel further submitted that in compliance of order dated 01.04.2024 passed in CWJC No.3270 of 2024, the Director, Secondary Education (respondent no.4) issued a reasoned order, vide Memo No.1341 dated 15.05.2024 communicating to all District Education Officers under the State of Bihar, mentioning therein that the candidates out of Bihar would not be given relaxation in marks, therefore, only those candidates having 60 % marks in CTET would be continued in service, in case she (female) have less than 60 % marks in CTET she would not be treated as qualified to be appointed as school teacher, similar stands has been taken with respect to disabled candidates and in place of 50 % qualifying marks, 60 % qualifying marks have been fixed as eligibility criteria for CTET.