Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

'I do not find any substance in the submissions made on behalf of the plaintiffs/opposite parties that a disputed question of facts with regard to existence of a path way on a particular plot of land or to a plot of land adjacent thereto can be ascertained without taking physical measurement of the same by appointing Commissioner. I do not accept the submissions made on behalf of the plaintiffs/opposite parties that it is an attempt on the part of the petitioners for fishing out evidence. I do not find that the decision of Institution of Engineers (Supra) has any manner of application in this case in view of the distinguishable facts and circumstances of that case. In that case the issue was alleged forgery with regard to the proxy vote in connection with an election.' In the case of Kalandi Swain Vs Braja Kishore reported in (1980) ILR. I Ori P-98 the Hon'ble Court observed that provision for inspection in Rule 7 has been enacted mostly for the purpose of keeping on record the existing condition of the property so that if the same is subjected later on to any change, determination or mischief by any of the parties or by any other agency or reason that can be known by the Court if and when required.