Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parayan in V.Arumugam vs State : Rep. By Its on 15 March, 2022Matching Fragments
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the entire records from the Inspector of Police, Puducherry, Vigilance and Anti- Corruption, in FIR No.2 of 2016 and quash the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2. The FIR came to be registered on the basis of the complaint of G.Kalaiselvan, dated 12.04.2016, for the offences under Sections 7, 13(1) d (ii) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. It is alleged in the complaint that the defacto complainant when working as a Station House Officer of Orleanpet Police Station, received an information at 10.45 hours on 02.04.2016 that a video has been posted in Whatsapp social media network showing Mr.V.Arumugam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Orleanpet Police Station was receiving cash from a person and keeping the same in his table drawer. After seeing the video, on 03.04.2016, he submitted a report to the Superintendent of Police (East) stating that a petition was received through post from one M.Kumar on 01.04.2016, in which, he stated that he was working as a Supervisor under a Civil Contractor Senthilkumar and the said Senthilkumar failed to pay him for his work. On 23.02.2016, at about 9.30 hours, he went to the house of Senthilkumar along with his wife and daughter and asked for payment, for which, Senthilkumar abused them in filthy words and called him as Parayan. Therefore, he gave a complaint at PCR Cell, Puducherry, but no action was taken. An entry was made in the case diary and the Inspector https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis of Police directed the Sub-Inspector of Police, V.Arumugam to conduct enquiry on 02.04.2016. On 02.04.2016 at about 13.30 hours, both Kumar and Senthilkumar were enquired by the Sub-Inspector of Police, V.Arumugam. During the enquiry, the said Senthilkumar agreed to settle the issue amicably and ready to pay the petitioner through the enquiry officer V.Arumugam. Senthilkumar gave Rs.30,000/- to Kumar through the Sub-Inspector of Police, V.Arumugam. The video also disclosed that the Sub-Inspector of Police, V.Arumugam was found to be receiving a sum of Rs.10,000/- from Senthilkumar to settle the issue. The Sub- Inspector of Police, V.Arumugam has not given any satisfactory reply for the receipt of an additional amount of Rs.10,000/-. Therefore, this complaint. Challenging the said FIR, this Criminal Original Petition has been filed.