Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4) It is the contention of the informant that Bhikchand had not signed on Exhs. 6 to 12 and these signatures are forged. It is his contention that Bhikchand used to sign in Modi script, but the signatures appearing on these documents do not appears to be in Modi script. According to him, Advocate Dilip Joshi, applicant No. 3 had fled these documents in the Court and Bhikchand had not turned up. It is contended that Bhikchand was not in a position to move, he was bed ridden and his eye sight and hearing capacities were afected and he was not in a position to sign on any document. It is contended that Advocate Joshi joined hands with applicant Nos. 1 and 2 and with the intention to grab the property of both Pyarabai and Bhikchand such objection was taken. The F.I.R. was given on 13.10.2017 when according to the informant those documents were fled in the Court on 24.9.2015.