Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

12. In his cross examination done by Ld. Counsel for R3, he deposed that he is not an eye witness of the accident and as such he cannot tell anything about the accident. He denied the suggestion that no such accident took place with the said vehicle or that the said vehicle has falsely implicated in the said case. He further deposed that the driver and owner of the alleged offending vehicle are not known to him and his family. He further deposed that he does not know anything about the other persons travelling in the said offending vehicle at the time of accident. He further deposed that he cannot admit or deny the suggestion that the said vehicle was taken on hire as on the date of accident. He denied the suggestion that he knows fully well that the said vehicle was taken on hire but he is deliberately and intentionally not admitted the said fact just to claim false compensation and to favour the driver and owner of the offending vehicle. The date of birth of the deceased Dinesh was 07.11.1994. He further deposed that he is doing the busienss of manufacturing of sox since the last 7-8 years and earning about Rs.12,000/- to Rs.14,000/- per month, however, she does not have any documentary proof regarding the same. He denied the suggestion that the deceased was not employed or that he was not earning any amount as on the date of accident. He further denied the suggestion that the document Ex.PW-1/A is a false and procured document. He further denied the suggestion that he is deposing falsely.