Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

It comes out that the petitioner was previously working in HSMITC. On the closer of HSMITC, he was posted as a Clerk in the office of respondent no.2, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kurukshetra. On the retirement of the petitioner, HSMITC issued a letter dated 2.12.2015 for recovery of Rs.1,10,250/- on account of 270 days excess leave encashment paid to the petitioner. On the basis of the said letter, respondent no.2 has withheld said amount from the retiral benefits of the petitioner vide order dated 25.1.2016 (Annexure P2) and dated 31.1.2016/1.2.2016 (Annexure P4). Neither HSMITC has been made party nor letter dated 2.12.2015 (Annexure R1) has been challenged in the present writ petition.