Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

32. Another important aspect, which cannot be overlooked by us to be considered for the present controversy, is that if Regulation-10 is     read in precision, vide its clause (2)(d), it contemplates a complete selection process, which is based on merits as after the conclusion of the selection, the management is required to prepare a register in duplicate based on the quality point marks obtained by the candidates and it also contemplates providing of the ratio of candidates to be called for interview as against the number of each vacant post available to the filled. Unlike the procedure as provided under Regulation-10, in Regulation-17 no such stipulation is contemplated as that of Regulation 10(2)(d), that the appointment of Assistant Teachers or the Headmaster of the institution in an aided minority institution is to be made on the basis of quality point marks or on the merits of the matter. Besides Regulation 10(2)(d), there is no other provision in the Regulation which deals with process of allocation of quality point marks. Since by Regulation 17(2)(e), Regulation 10(2)(d) has not been made applicable to selection of Assistant Teacher (Primary) (BTC) in Aided Minority Institutions, the argument of petitioner's counsel cannot be accepted by us to the effect that no quality point mark was awarded to the appellants.