Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

"7. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the order dated 05.10.2020 issued by the respondent No.1 shall remain stayed. Further, the computers of the petitioners shall be made functional forthwith and so shall the biometric attendance machine for them to mark their attendance in the office of the respondent No.2, as they were doing earlier.
8. We may clarify that the aforesaid order is being passed in the light of the submission made by Mr. Singhdev, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/NMC that it is on the directions of the respondent No.1 that the respondent No.2 has been disbursing the monthly salaries to all the 94 petitioners. That being the position, there is no good reason why public money should be frittered away preventing the petitioners from discharging their duties as they were doing on 14.11.2019."
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ld. SG Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Tanoodbhav Singhdev, Adv Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv For Respondent(s) Mr. Paramjit Patwalia, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Vivek Chib, Adv.