Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

the plaintiff. The extension work as required under the map was not done and thereby the plaintiff alleges to cause a loss of Rs.15,000/- to him. The defendants have of also not constructed Septic Tank which caused a loss of Rs.15,000/- to him. The defendants failed to erect 9 rt inches Brick wall in the first floor which caused a loss of Rs.10,000/- to him. The further allegation of the plaintiff is of the Iron bars as per the agreement not used and thereby caused a loss of Rs.30,000/-. It is further alleged by the plaintiff that the defendants have not completed the work within the stipulated period and caused a loss of Rs.15,000/-.

averred to arise from theirs not constructing a septic tank hence entailing upon him a loss of Rs.15,000/-. The .

purported breach on the part of the defendants qua theirs under Ext.PW-1/A standing enjoined to erect a wall holding a width of 12 inches in departure wherefrom they of erected a wall holding a width of 6 inches with a concomitant entailment of loss to the plaintiff whereupon rt he seeks pecuniary indemnification from the defendants constituted in a sum of Rs.10,000/- is wholly rudderless, given the relevant agreement comprised in Ext.PW-1/A omitting to specify the width of the retaining wall.