Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ipcl in Ipcl vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 27 January, 2005Matching Fragments
And as per Paragraph 5.5 of show cause notice (Tested at M/s. IPCL) is -
Sr. No. Product Unit Content 1 Propane + Propylene % 0.01 2 Propadiene% % 0.01 3 Methyl Acetylene Ppm <25 4 1-3-Butadiene % Traces 5 1-2-Butadiene Ppm <25 6 Iso-Butane % 2.46 7 n-Butane % 9.24 8 Butene-1 % 32.85 9 Iso-Butene % 35.26 10 Trans-Butene-2 % 12.03 11 Cis-Butene-2 % 8.11 12 Ethyle Acetylene Ppm <25 13 Vinyl Acetylene Ppm <25 14 CSs ppm Ppm <25 15 Dinner Ppm <25 16 NMP Ppm <10
(ii) The appellants also relied upon the specification of LPG as per IS 4576-1999 and the following documents for the purpose of establishing that the C-4 Raffinate (return stream) is nothing but liquefied petroleum gas and therefore eligible for the concessional rate of duty in terms of Notification Nos. 6/2000-C.E., dated 1-3-2000 and 3/2001-C.E., dated 1-3-2001.
(a) Copy of letter dated 25-9-2002 addressed by IPCL to Chief Controller of Explosives, Nagpur;
(b) Letter dated 27-9-2002 issued by Chief Controller of Explosives granting the required permission after satisfying that the specification of C-4 Raffinate conforms to LPG as per IS 4576-1999;
Sr. No. Date Event
(i) 23-4-1984 Letter by Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Vadodara issued to IPCL informing that C-4 Raffinate (Return Stream) is not different from C-4 Raffinate. (Annexure-21)
(ii) 11-12-1984 Test Reports for comparison of receipt and Return Stream of C-4 Raffinate as seen by Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Division IV, Vadodara.