Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Abinitio void in Sudhanshu Rathi, Delhi vs Dcit, Central Circle, Noida on 3 January, 2022Matching Fragments
APPELLANT RESPONDENT
PAN No: AIAPR3907M
Assessee By : Shri Deepesh Garg, Advocate
Revenue By : Shri H.K. Chaudhary, CIT(DR)
PER BENCH:
(A) For the sake of convenience and brevity these appeals by assessee are disposed
off through this consolidated order. Grounds taken in these appeals of the Assessee are as under:
ITA No.-5515/Del/2018 "1) That having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in assuming jurisdiction and issue of notice u/s 153A r/w section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Ld. Assessing Officer and the consequent assessment proceedings in the case are bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and void-abinitio and basic jurisdictional conditions and pre-requisites under section 153 A were not met.
6) That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. A.O. in passing the impugned order and that too without giving adequate opportunity of hearing and without observing the principle of natural justice.
7) That the appellant craves the leave to add, alter or amend the grounds of appeal at any stage and all the grounds are without prejudice to each other."
ITA No.-5517/Del/2018 "1) That having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in assuming jurisdiction and issue of notice u/s 153A r/w section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Ld. Assessing Officer and the consequent assessment proceedings in the case are bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and void-abinitio and basic jurisdictional conditions and pre-requisites under section 153 A were not met.
7) That the appellant craves the leave to add, alter or amend the grounds of appeal at any stage and all the grounds are without prejudice to each other."
ITA No.-5518/Del/2018 "1) That having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in assuming jurisdiction and issue of notice u/s 153A r/w section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Ld. Assessing Officer and the consequent assessment proceedings in the case are bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and void-abinitio and basic jurisdictional conditions and pre-requisites under section 153 A were not met.
6) That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. A.O. in passing the impugned order and that too without giving adequate opportunity of hearing and without observing the principle of natural justice.
7) That the appellant craves the leave to add, alter or amend the grounds of appeal at any stage and all the grounds are without prejudice to each other."
ITA No.-5519/Del/2018 "1) That having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in assuming jurisdiction and issue of notice u/s 153A r/w section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Ld. Assessing Officer and the consequent assessment proceedings in the case are bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and void-abinitio and basic jurisdictional conditions and pre-requisites under section 153 A were not met.