Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: convocation certificate in Sri Abhishek Gowda K.S vs M/S.Samruddhi Enterprises on 2 July, 2016Matching Fragments
14. ISSUE No.3: It is the contention of the petitioner that due to the accident he has sustained grievous injuries and he has relied upon wound certificate and discharge summary which are marked at Ex.P.2 and P.8. He also produced the notarized copy of S.S.L.C. marks card, PUC marks card, B.E. Semister marks card at Ex.P.13 to 16 to show that he has done Engineering graduation and he is academically good. He also produced provisional certificate and convocation certificate at Ex.P.17 and 18. It is also his case that he has spent Rs.13,56,158/- towards medical expenses and he has produced prescriptions at Ex.P.20. He was subjected to cross-examination. In the cross- examination, it is suggested that he has sustained only simple injuries and not grievous injuries and the same was denied. It is further suggested that he has falsely claimed that he has spent an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- and the same was denied. It is suggested that medical bills are created and produced to get more compensation and the said suggestion was denied. He says he has not received any medical reimbursement. It is suggested that, he is not having any difficulties and he is alright and he has falsely pleaded about the avocation and graduation and the same was denied.
18. The petitioner in the petition has contended that he has passed B.E.Engineering and he was searching job in the Multi National Companies and also he has produced S.S.L.C.,P.U.C. marks card as Ex.P.14 to 16 and also produced provisional certificate and convocation certificate as Ex.P.17 and 18. On perusal of these documents, it discloses that the petitioner is a meritorious student and in the SSLC he got 468/626 and secured 74.88% and in PUC he secured 460/600 and he has completed his B.E. in some of the semesters he has secured First class and in some of the semesters he has secured second class and also produced Provisional Degree Certificate and B.E.Convocation certificate. The petitioner counsel in support of his contention he has relied upon the judgment of Apex Court reported in 2014 ACJ 2648 (Ashvinbhai Jayantilal Modi Vs. Ramkaran Ramchandra Sharma and another). In this judgment the Apex Court has taken the income of the medical student at Rs.25,000/p.a. The petitioner counsel also relied upon the unreported judgment of Division bench of Karnataka High Court in M.F.A. No. 18/2007 and in this judgment the Division Bench has taken note of the 3rd year B.E. student and observed that he would have completed his B.E. in such an event his income per month could not be less than Rs.25,000/p.m. Considering the uncertainty in life, they have assessed the income at Rs.10,000/p.m. as he has to suffer from paraplegia and confined to bed on account of the disability for the rest of his life.
ANNEXURES:
Witnesses examined on behalf of the petitioners:
P.W.1 : Abhishek Gowda K.S P.W.2 : Dr.Santhosh N.U.
Documents marked on behalf of the petitioners:
Ex.P-1 : Copy of FIR
Ex.P-2 : Copy of wound certificate
Ex.P-3 : Copy of Police intimation
Ex.P-4 : Copy of mahazar
Ex.P-5 : Copy of sketch
Ex.P-6 : Copy of IMV report
Ex.P-7 : Copy of charge sheet
Ex.P-8 : Discharge summary
Ex.P-9 : Copy of 133 notice
Ex.P-10 : Reply to 133 notice
Ex.P-11 : Accident information report
Ex.P-12 : Copy of driving licence (original
compared)
Ex.P.13 Notarised copy of Voter identity card
(original compared)
Ex.P.14 Notarised copy of SSLC marks card
(original compared)
Ex.P.15 Notarised copy of PUC marks card
(original compared)
Ex.P.16 Notarised copy of B.E.Semester marks
card(8) (original compared)
Ex.P.17 Certified copy of Provisional Degree
certificate
Ex.P.18 Certified copy of convocation certificate
Ex.P.19 Medical bills (56)
Ex.P.20 Prescriptions (8)
Ex.P.21 Medical bills
Ex.P.22 OP record
Ex.P.23 &24 Inpatient records
Ex.P.25 X-rays (18) and C.T.Scan films(5)