Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: false marksheet in Madhu Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 2 April, 2025Matching Fragments
3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner has obtained the post of Anganwari Sevika on the basis of forged documents.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. As per allegation in the F.I.R, the petitioner has submitted false marksheet for obtaining the job of Anganwari Sevika. He further submits that although selection of the petitioner was made by the Aam Sabha and after the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15363 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 recommendation of the Aam Sabha, the petitioner has joined the service in question and the authority after verifying all the documents of the petitioner gave direction to her to join on the said post in question. He further submits that the petitioner has submitted all the educational certificates which she has obtained from the competent board/university. He further submits that after the filing of the present F.I.R, the petitioner has resigned from the post in question.