Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

11. Provide Statement of Ganga Sahay Meena It was agreed that recorded and written transcription in the statements/accounts of matter of Ganga Shahay Vs Sarala held at witnesses etc., cannot be Procter Office & G S kaish provided...

17. Provide date on which meeting was held by The chairperson, GSCASH Admin. JNU at Procter Office & GSCAS in may provide dates of the matter of Ganga Shahay Vs Sarala. Provide meetings. all date of meeting, proceedings, minutes. Provide date of inquiry completed, report prepared, date by which report had been accepted by GSCASH, date by which final report prepared. Provide all document in this regard

Information was not provided from Q. No. 1 to 21 & from 24 to 25.

Information provided Respondent no.2:

1. The complaints of GS Meena are enclosed. Copies of evidence/documents submitted by witnesses are also confidential and cannot be provided as per rules.
11. The copies of the recorded statements of GS Meena and the written transcripts will be provided in a month's time by GSCASH as agreed by the Appellant
17. The GSCASH Chairperson and members of the Enquiry Committee met the JNU Administration on 28/04/2009 to discuss the case. There was only one meeting that was held between the administration and GSCASH members. No such minutes of the meeting were prepared by GSCASH. The Enquiry Committee completed the case and presented the report before the GSCASH on 02/04/2009, after which it was unanimously accepted by the GSCASH. The copy of adoption of report is enclosed.
18. This does not pertain to GSCASH.
19. This does not pertain to GSCASH.

Order of the First Appellate Authority:

Point wise remarks had been given by the FAA.
Grounds for Second Appeal:
Incomplete & unsatisfactory reply.
Page 2 of 3
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present Appellant: Mr. Ganga Sahay Meena;
Respondent: Mr. Jit Singh, Public Information Officer & Dy. Registrar;
Mr. V. K. Jain, Registrar and First Appellate Authority; Dr. Ms. K. B. Usha, Chairperson,(GSCASH);
The Appellant has sought a copy of the complaint made by Ms. Sarla Meena based on which GSCASH instituted an inquiry against him. The PIO has stated that there was no specific complaint but that in the course of deposition before the Chief Proctor certain statements were treated as a complaint based on which the inquiry was instituted.
1. The PIO is directed to give a copy of this deposition after severing under Section-10 the names of witnesses. The PIO has claimed exemption under Section 8(1) & (g) for severing the names of witnesses. The Appellant has also sought any evidences given in the deposition.