Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. The petitioner states that the people residing in the area have given repeated representations to the respondents, but the representations have not been considered. The petitioner states that removal of TASMAC Shop No.1964 is necessary for the safety of women and children living in that area.

6. The respondents have filed a counter. They have given a table showing the distance between the wineshop and the school, temple, residential area, children's park, community hall, Printing Press, State Highway and District Road. The Table is as under.