Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejectment execution in Mst. Hosnaki And Ors. vs State Through Sheo Baran Rai on 20 September, 1955Matching Fragments
In -- 'Kulada Kinkar Hoy v. Danesh Mir', 33 Col 33 (FB) (N), it was observed that a Magistrate is not concluded by every decree of a civil Court. In -- "Masih, Uddin v. The State', ATR 1953 All 383 (O), Wali Ullah J., said at page 384 that .the Magistrate "did not attach that importance to the decree for ejectment and the. execution proceedings consequent upon it, which' it was his bouiiden duty to do", and that if a right to possession has been, declared in favour of a party, "that decision must be respected and maintained by the criminal Court". It is not clear if the learned Judge meant that the Magistrate was concluded by the decision of the civil Court, but if be meant so, I respectfully differ.