Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
(2) Every application under sub-section (1) shall be in such form and shall
be accompanied by such fee and such documents as may be prescribed by the
Central Government.
(3) If the applicant passes such test as may be prescribed by the Central
Government, he shall be issued the driving licence:
Provided that no such test shall be necessary where the applicant produces
proof to show that –
(i) the applicant has previously held a driving licence and that the period
between the date of expiry of that licence and the date of such application
does not exceed five years; or
the applicant holds or has previously held a driving licence to drive such
class of vehicle issued under section 18; or
the applicant holds a driving licence to drive such class of vehicle issued
by a competent authority of any country outside India, subject to the
condition that the applicant complies with the provisions of sub –section
(3) of section 8,
“16. Form of driving licence.—(1) Every driving licence issued or
renewed by a licensing authority shall be in Form 6.
(2) Where the licensing authority has the necessary apparatus, [for the
issue of a laminated card type or Smart Card type driving licence, such
card type or Smart Card type driving licence, as may be specified in the
Notification issued by the concerned State Government or Union Territory
Administration] shall be in Form 7.
(3) On and from the date of commencement of this sub-rule, every driving
licence issued or renewed by the licensing authority shall be in Form 7.
“9. Relying on these definitions, Mr S.C. Sharda submitted that admittedly
the trailer was filled with stones. He submitted that once a trailer was
attached to the tractor the tractor became a transport vehicle as it was
used for carriage of goods. He submitted that Section 10(2) of the Motor
Vehicles Act provides for grant of licences to drive specific types of
vehicles. He submitted that the driver only had a licence to drive a
tractor. He submitted that the driver did not have a licence to drive a
transport vehicle. He submitted that therefore it could not be said that
the driver had an effective and valid driving licence to drive a goods
carriage or a transport vehicle. He submitted that thus the driver did not
have a valid driving licence to drive the type of vehicle he was driving.
He submitted that as the driver did not have a valid driving licence to
drive a transport vehicle, the Insurance Company could not be made liable.
He submitted that the High Court was right in so holding.
10. We are unable to accept the submissions of Mr S.C. Sharda. It is an
admitted fact that the driver had a valid and effective licence to drive a
tractor. Undoubtedly under Section 10, a licence is granted to drive
specific categories of motor vehicles. The question is whether merely
because a trailer was attached to the tractor and the tractor was used for
carrying goods, the licence to drive a tractor becomes ineffective. If the
argument of Mr S.C. Sharda is to be accepted, then every time an owner of a
private car, who has a licence to drive a light motor vehicle, attaches a
roof carrier to his car or a trailer to his car and carries goods thereon,
the light motor vehicle would become a transport vehicle and the owner
would be deemed to have no licence to drive that vehicle. It would lead to
absurd results. Merely because a trailer is added either to a tractor or to
a motor vehicle by itself does not make that tractor or motor vehicle a
transport vehicle. The tractor or motor vehicle remains a tractor or motor
vehicle. If a person has a valid driving licence to drive a tractor or a
motor vehicle, he continues to have a valid licence to drive that tractor
or motor vehicle even if a trailer is attached to it and some goods are
carried in it. In other words, a person having a valid driving licence to
drive a particular category of vehicle does not become disabled to drive
that vehicle merely because a trailer is added to that vehicle.