Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

relied upon the Larger Bench Judgment of this court in the matter of Tara & 35 Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr, reported in 2015(3) WLC (Raj.) 548 wherein it has been held as under:-

"Question:- (i) Whether land held in Jagir by Idol cultivated by

(a) person other than the Shebait/Pujari, or

(b) hired labour or servants engaged by Shebait/Pujari as tenant of deity (a perpetual minor) will be regarded as held in tenancy by person cultivating same as tenant of deity;

will still be held as land held in personal cultivation of deity or it would be treated as land in tenancy of person cultivating it as tenant of deity;

Answer:- (Para 26):-

26. In view of the above discussion, we decide the question No. (i) in favour of the State and against the Shebait/Pujari claiming the land to be saved by the Jagirs Act of 1952. The land held in Jagir by Hindu idol (deity) as Dolidar or Muafidar cultivated by a person other than the Shebait/Pujari of the deity personally or by hired labour or servants engaged by (6 of 12) [CW-17953/2016] its Shebait/Pujari as a tenant of the deity, shall vest in the State, after the Jagirs Act of 1952. The Hindu idol (deity), even if it is treated to be a perpetual minor, could not continue to hold such land. Such land cannot be treated to be in its personal cultivation. A tenant of such land cultivating the land acquired the rights of khatedar of the State. Such land under the tenancy of a person other than Shebait/Pujari of Hindu Idol (deity) became khatedari land of such tenant. The name of Hindu Idol (deity) from such land had to be expunged from the revenue records with Shebait/Pujuri having no right to claim the land as Khatedar. Consequently, they had no right to transfer such lands, and all such transfers have to be treated as null and void, in contravention of the Jagirs Act 1952, and the land under such transfers to be resumed by the State.

Question (ii). What are rights of the Hindu (deity) in lands held by it in name of Shebait/Pujari on date of resumption of such Jagir, under provisions of Rajasthan Land Reforms & Resumption of Jagir Act, 1952;

Answer:- (Para No.30) In view of the above, we answer the question No. (ii) in favour of the State and against the persons claiming land for Hindu idol (deity) as Dolidar or Muafidar. The Hindu Idol (deity) in the lands held by them in the name of its Shebait/Pujari on the date of resumption of such Jagir under the provisions of the Jagirs Act of 1952 did not have any rights except in khudkasht land cultivated by Shebait/Pujari either by themselves or by hired labour or servant engaged by them for the benefit of the expenses of the temple including sewa puja.