Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: sunil poddar in 3. Title Of The Case : State vs . Vinod Kumar on 22 August, 2013Matching Fragments
1. On receipt of DD No. 68B at around 9.35 pm, Inspector Richpal Singh alongwth Ct. Dulichand reached at E52, Jhandewalan, where Sh. Sunil Poddar (complainant) met them and Inspector Richpal Singh recorded the statement of Sunil Poddar (Ex. PW1/A. After recording the statement of the complainant, present FIR was registered on the allegations that on 16.02.1999 at about 4.30 pm, the Cashier of the complainant namely Sehdev gave payment of Rs. 1,00,000/. to the accused Vimal Kumar to be made to Sh. Harjeet Arora, R/o 19/19, Old Rajender Nagar, Jhandewalan, Paharganj. At about 8.00 pm, the complainant inquired telephonically from Sh. Harjeet Arora about the receiving of payment and Harjeet Arora told that neither the accused Vimal Kumar came to him nor any payment had been received from accused Vimal Kumar by him. Thereafter the complainant Sunil Kumar Poddar inquired from his cashier Sehdev about the whereabouts of the Vimal Kumar who also told that accused Vimal Kumar had not come back. Thereafter the complainant searched the accused but to no gain. As per complaint of the complainant, the accused Vimal Kumar had fled away with the payment of Rs. 1,00,000/. A rukka (Ex.PW2/A)was prepared and sent to the police station for registration of the case through Ct. Duli Chand and the case was registered against the accused u/s 408 IPC.
2. The Prosecution had furnished list of 8 witnesses in order to prove its case and out of them only 7 witnesses were produced by the Prosecution.
3. Sh. Sunil Poddar is (PW1). He deposed that on 16.02.1999 at about 4.30 pm, the Cashier namely Sehdev gave a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/. to the accused Vimal Kumar to be given to Sh. Harjeet Arora, R/o 19/19, Old Rajender Nagar, Jhandewalan, Paharganj. At about 8.00 pm, the he inquired telephonically from Sh. Harjeet Arora about the receiving of payment and Harjeet Arora told that neither the accused Vimal Kumar came to him nor any payment had been received from accused Vimal Kumar by him. Thereafter he inquired from his cashier Sehdev about the whereabouts of the Vimal Kumar who also told that accused Vimal Kumar had not come back. Thereafter the complainant searched the accused but to no gain and he reported the matter to the police.
4. Sh. Harjit Singh is PW2 to whom a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/ was to be paid.
5. HC Narin Singh is PW3 who recorded the FIR.
6. Sh. Sehdev is (PW4 is the cashier of the complainant.
7. SI Yograj is PW5 who arrested the accused vide arrest memo Ex. PW5/DA.
8. Inspector Richpal Singh ( PW6) is the IO of the case. It is stated by him that on 16.02.1999 he was posted at PS Paharganj and on that day he received DD No. 68B at around 9.35 pm and upon receiving the said DD, he alongwith Ct. Dulichand went at E52, Jhandewalan factory area, Paharganj where complainant Sunil Poddar met them and he made inquiry from him and recorded the statement Ex. PW1/A and got the case registered on the statement of the complainant through Ct. Duli Chand. He prepared the site plan Ex. PW6/A at the instance of the complainant.
13. From this statement, it is proved that Rs. 1,00,000/ was not entrusted to the accused and it is also not proved that whether the accused was working for the complaint or he was his servant, as the complainant has not placed on file any documentary proof to show that he was working with him or any money was entrusted to him. No salary slip/ documents has been placed by the complainant with regard to the employment of the accused with him.
14. Second Material witness of this case is Harjeet Singh (PW2) to whom a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/ was to be paid. The relevant portion of the cross examination of this witness is produced herein below: "I did not submit any document to the police regarding the bill raised towards Sunil Poddar. I do not know whether accused Vimal Srivastava was employee of Sunil Poddar. I do not know whether any documents has been submitted by Sunil Poddar with regard to bill raised by me against him. I do not visit the police Station Paharganj. Police did not record my statement I do now know whether Sunil Poddar had given sum of Rs. 1 lakh to accused Vimal Kumar for making payment to me"