Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: illegal export in Converted As Suo Motu Pil vs Union Of India on 17 February, 2025Matching Fragments
58. The learned Amicus Curiae has submitted detailed and elaborate reports on the pertinent issues raised in the PIL. He had been provided with all the primary data and records of the official agencies for a careful scrutiny. It should be pointed out that the Central government agencies, viz., the DAE – AMD (Respondent No. 2) and IBM (Respondent no. 4) have not disputed the findings of fact in the three Amicus Curiae Reports with respect to illegal mining and transportation of BSMs by the mining companies. In particular the AMD has not disputed the findings of the Amicus Curiae in the second Report about presence of monazite in processed mineral stocks kept by the mining companies in their godowns. This apart, the State https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Government has very clearly and emphatically accepted the findings of fact in the Amicus report on scale of illegal mining, transportation and export, as also the Royalty Report filed before this Court.
(1) The high quantum of illegal mining and transportation of BSMs by various mining companies.
(2) High presence of Radio Active Monazite in the semi-processed and processed BSMs stocks kept by various mining companies / Plant owners.
Show Cause Notice Issued:
72. The State Government accepted the findings pertaining to illegal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis mining, transportation, export and royalty payments on all four reports since the findings of Bedi report, Sahoo's report, Reassessment report and Amicus Curiae report were on the same lines and the findings correlated with each other. Hence, based on the reports and findings, the Government after perusing the relevant documents had issued showcase notices directing the mining parties to reply as to why Cost of minerals and Royalty should not be recovered from them for the quantum of minerals unlawfully mined and transported during the pre-ban period in respect of the mining leases granted
(15) Whether there is a need for a comprehensive investigation into the role of officials involved in the backdrop of the findings in the Committee reports and Amicus reports?
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
128. The issues as framed are categorised below into four core sections, with further sub-classifications, to enable an in-depth analysis:
S.No. CONTENTS Page
No.
(A) Illegal Mining, Storage, Transportation and Export 81
of BSMs
Mining
1.4 Operations Carried Out in Violation of Mining 86
Plans
Committee
1.6 Allegations of Bias against Mr.Gagandeep 89
Singh Bedi I.A.S
MMRD ACT
1.8 Methodology Adopted by the Committees to 95
Inspect and Verify the Extent and Quantum of
Illegal Mining
1.9 Extent and Quantum of Illegal BSMs in Three 103
Districts – Pre-Ban Period
1.11 Post Ban Period – Illicit Beach Sand Mining 106
1.12 Difference in the Stocks Kept in the Three 108
Districts
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.No. CONTENTS Page
No.
1.14 Premature Termination of Mining Lease 111
2.1 Environmental Laws on Mineral Processing 117
Clearances
2.5 Role of Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board 121
(TNPCB)
2.6 Doctrine of Public Trust and Sustainable 122
Development
3.1 Illegalities in Grant of Transport Permits 129
3.2 Illegal Transportation Left Unchecked 134
4.1 High Quantum of Monazite Concentration in 136
Processed Stock
(A) Illegal Mining, Storage, Transportation and Exports of BSMs:
(1) Extent and Quantum of Illegal Beach Sand Mining:
129. Rule 2(iia) of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 defines “illegal mining”, as “any reconnaissance or prospecting or mining operation undertaken by any person or a company in any area without holding a reconnaissance permit or a prospecting licence or as the case may be, a mining lease as required under sub-section(1) of section 4 of the Act”. 1.1 What Constitutes Illegal Mining: