Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. It is the further case of PW1 that after the seizure of the material objects from the above house, he contacted System Expert and summoned him from the D.I.G.Office, Thrissur and after :-11-:

ascertaining the password from the second accused viz.,'Praveen' and by using the said password, got operated the computer and printer seized as per Ext.P6 search list and made fake notes and thus, according to PW1, the fake notes, so got, resembled as MOs.1 to 100 series and the fake notes, so got, were burnt off by himself. According to PW1, thereafter, they proceeded to the Police Station and prepared Ext.P7 remand report with respect to first and second accused and produced them before the court and obtained the custody of the second accused on the basis of Ext.P8 order. It is the further claim of PW1 that in pursuance of Ext.P11 disclosure statement made by the second accused and as led by him, PW1 had effected recovery of the pocket diary of the second accused from the above said house. Thus, MO129 is the pocket diary so recovered and Ext.P11(a) is the mahazar for recovery of MO129 pocket diary. According to PW1, second accused has also made another disclosure statement and the same is marked as :-12-:
completing the investigation.

14. As I indicated earlier, during the time of defence evidence, DW1 was examined and his deposition shows that Building No.XXIV/342 situated at Chalakkudy is belonging to him and the said building was rented out to one I.T.Unnikrishnan, on a monthly rent of Rs.2500/- as per Ext.D1 rent deed. According to PW1, the said Unnikrishnan is running a DTP centre in the said building by name and style Cybertek. According to him, during the month of February 2000, Police have seized the accessories of computers and printer from the said building. These are the evidence and materials on record which were considered by the trial court.