Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

This original petition has been filed challenging Ext.P12 order whereby I.A.No.1 of 2024 filed in O.S.No.16 of 2016 before the Munsiff Court, Attingal has been rejected, stating that the decree cannot be drawn up with a schedule produced at a later stage after the dismissal of the suit. Even though notice was served on the respondent, the respondent has chosen not to appear before this Court. Apparently the respondent has no objection to the prayer made. There is no reason why the decree holder should suffer solely for the reason that the plaint item has not been scheduled.

16 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18-10-2019 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 18.10.2019 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF EP NO. 50 OF 2023 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE E-DIARY DATED 13.12.2023 SHOWING THE PROCEEDINGS IN EP NO. 50 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.01.2024 IN EP NO. 50 OF 2023 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P10 THE TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 1 OF 2024 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO AMEND THE PLAINT 2026:KER:7138 OP(C) NO. 1271 OF 2024 Exhibit P11 THE TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 2 OF 2024 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO CORRECT THE DECREE IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 Exhibit P12 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A. NO. 1 OF 2024 IN OS NO. 16 OF 2016 DATED 26.03.2024, ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL