Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. The contents of the private complainant are that the A.2 filed a suit O.S.No.325 of 2010 before the Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Repalle, for recovery of alleged debt covered by promissory note, dt.03.11.2007 in which the A.3 is attestor and the A.4 is scribe of an endorsement on the back of it and the complainant as defendant contended in the suit that he executed promissory note in favour of deceased D.Sheshaiah (father of A.1- D.Manohara Rao) on 03.11.2001 and also discharged the same with interest. Since said Sheshaiah was a bona fide person, complainant did not take back the promissory note even discharged the debt thinking Sheshaiah would not do any harm to him by taking advantage of it and after ten years, the suit was brought into light, after death of said Sheshaiah, by his son A.1- D.Manohar Rao and the complainant explained to him of what happened in the past and said that he is not liable to pay the debt to his father Sheshaiah. Thereby the A.1, conspired with others, forged signatures of deceased Sheshaiah by taking advantage of promissory note dt.03.11.2007 (mistakenly mentioned as 2002), might have brought promissory note making digit '7' from '2' by material alteration by forgery and fabrication and the word in Telugu ' ెండు' also corrected as 'ఏడు' for the purpose of limitation in fabrication of the transfer endorsement in favour of the complainant in cause filing the suit and the other accused also gave false evidence intentionally in the judicial proceeding by its fabrication, the FSL Expert opined that the alterations were present in the promissory note and thereby the accused committed the offences.