Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the order dated 02.03.2024 (Annexure P1) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat summoning the petitioner as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and directing separate trial to be initiated against him in case FIR No.104 dated 11.03.2016, under Sections 148, 307, 302, 333, 353 & 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Ganaur, Sonepat, Haryana.

2.6 Thereafter, on 02.03.2024, the impugned order summoning the petitioner as an additional accused was passed and the Public Prosecutor voluntarily suffered a statement in the Court that he did not press the application qua ASI Bhagat Singh and Ravinder (brother of Sandeep Barswani).

2.7 The petitioner apprehending his arrest approached the Sessions Court, Sonepat seeking grant of pre-arrest bail which was 4 of 19 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:136526 declined vide order dated 12.03.2024. Subsequently, the petitioner approached this Court vide CRM-M-14297-2024 and the anticipatory petition was dismissed vide order dated 15.05.2024. Against this dismissal, the petitioner filed a Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.8886-2024 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India which has been dismissed vide order dated 14.10.2024.

12. Having regard to the entire discussion as above, this Court finds no illegality in the impugned order dated 02.03.2024 (Annexure P1) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat summoning the petitioner as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C in case FIR No.104 dated 11.03.2016, under Sections 148, 307, 302, 333, 353 and 149 of IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Ganaur, District Sonepat.

13. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.