Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: procured document in State vs . Anil Etc. on 11 September, 2014Matching Fragments
8. PW6 ASI Ram Diya in gist has deposed that on 23.10.2004, Dinesh Kumar PW2 came to PS Nangloi and gave statement Ex.PW2/A. FIR was registered and case was handed over to him. He went in search of accused and truck with Dinesh Kumar and HC Devender Singh. He gave notice under Section 160 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to driver of vehicle. Dharamvir came to PS on 26.10.2004. But he did not tell anything about the truck. On 01.10.2004, Dharamvir came to PP Tikri Border and stated that he drives truck bearing registration number HR55B1499 of his maternal uncle. The truck was recovered at his instance vide Ex.PW4/B. Accused Dharamvir made disclosure vide Ex.PW4/A, was arrested vide Ex.PW4/C and was searched vide Ex.PW6/A. He took four days police cutody of accused Dharamvir and searched for accused Anil, but he could not be apprehended and no recovery was made. When proceedings under Section 82 and 83 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were going on against accused Anil and Virender, they were arrested by special cell of Lodhi Colony. He procured documents regarding the same and applied for production warrants. On 27.04.2005, both the said accused were produced in the Court and after permission were interrogated. Anil made disclosure vide Ex.PW5/B and Virender vide Ex.PW5/C. Accused Anil was arrested vide Ex.PW5/B and Virender was arrested Ex.PW5/A. Virender was sent to judicial custody and he took three days police custody of Anil and search was made for accused Suresh, but in vain. No recovery was effected. Thereafter, case was transferred to special cell. He correctly identified accused Anil, Dharamvir and Virender (since PO) in the Court. PW6 was examined, crossexamined and discharged.