Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

i. Jaylakshmi w/o Moogatlal is lessee No. 1; she is not party to the suit after her death. Her tenancy right devolves upon all her legal heirs and just deleting her name will not serve purpose unless all her legal heirs on whom her tenancy right devolves surrenders their tenancy right. Her legal representatives were then necessary party to the suit.

ii. Parvatishankar s/o. Moogatlal is lessee No. 2; he is not party to the suit.

iii. Vijaykumar s/o Moogatlal is lessee No. 4; he is not party to the suit. He died prior to the suit. But his widow is defendant No. 8 to the suit. She has surrendered her right, which she inherited after Vijaykumar. But, Vijaykumar's entire tenancy rights will not devolve upon his widow. He has one son Parag (lessee No. 13) and two daughters viz. Mala (defendant No. 10) and Malini (lessee No. 10). The third daughter who has compromised the suit appears to have born subsequent to the lease deed dated 6/3/1959. His widow and three daughters surrendered their rights but tenancy right which Parag Viajaykumar received by inheritance prior to date of suit (on death of Vijaykumar) has not been surrendered. Likewise the right of Parag. which he holds as lessee No. 13 has not been surrendered.