Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Page 2352

1. The Civil Revision Petition filed against the order and Decree dated 13.10.2003 made in I.A. No. 55 of 2001 in R.C.O.P No.3 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Tindivanam.

2. The landlord who filed R.C.O.P No. 3 of 2000 under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act is the revision petitioner herein.

3. R.C.O.PNo.3 of 2000 was filed by the landlord/petitioner for fixing the fair rent and to direct the tenant bank to pay the same to the petitioner from 01.04.1999. The landlord/petitioner filed I.A. No. 55 of 2002 under Section 18(A) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960 (herein after called the Act) for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the petition property with the help of a P.W.D Engineer to decide the fair rent of the petition property by filing a report before the rent Controller. This petition was seriously contested by the respondent Bank and by an order dated 13.10.2003, the Rent Controller dismissed the said I.A. No. 55 of 2002 by solely relying upon the judgment of this Court reported in 2002 (3) LW 607 in (Thayammal v. Peria Isakki Thevar and Ors.). Aggrieved by the order of the Rent Controller, the landlord/petitioner preferred the C.R.P under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.