Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Amendment moved in Constituent Assembly Debates On 2 June, 1949 Part IiMatching Fragments
Mr. President: The next amendment, No. 2333, is not moved, Dr. Ambedkar may move amendment No. 2334.
The Honourable Dr.B.R. Ambedkar: Sir, I move:
"That clause (3) of article 153 be omitted."
This clause is apparently inconsistent with the scheme for a Constitutional Governor.
Mr. President: Amendment No. 2335 is the same as the amendment just moved. Amendment No. 2336 is not moved.
Shri H.V. Kamath: Mr. President, Sir, may I have your leave to touch upon the meaning or interpretation of the amendment that has just been moved by my learned Friend, Dr. Ambedkar? If this amendment is accepted by the House it would do away with the discretionary powers given to the Governor. There is, however, sub-clause (b). Am I to understand that so far as proroguing of the House is concerned, the Governor acts in consultation with the Chief Minister or the Cabinet and therefore no reference to it is necessary in clause (3)?
With these few words, I move my amendment.
(Amendment Nos. 2366, 2367 and 2368 were not moved.) Mr. President: Amendment No. 2369.
Shri T.T.Krishnamachari (Madras: General): May I ask, Sir, if Mr. Jaspat Roy Kapoor is going to move another amendment which stands in his name, article 159-A, which is another version of the amendment which is now before the House. If he is going to move that amendment, I think there is no point in moving this amendment. I think the latter amendment will serve the purpose he has in mind more adequately.
Shri Jaspat Roy Kapoor (United Provinces: General): I may assure my honourable Friend Mr. T.T. Krishnamachari that I will move all the relevant amendments. In order to enable me to move the amendment. I think it is necessary that I should move amendment No. 2369. Otherwise it will be permissible for me to move any other amendment which is an amendment to this amendment.
Mr. President: You may formally move this and then go to the amendments to this amendment.
Shri Jaspat Roy Kapoor: Is it your suggestion, Sir, that I need not read this?
I am therefore, suggesting that if you wish your Legislators to be free from temptation, if you wish them to serve the public disinterestedly, and solely with an eye on public service, then I think it is necessary that you should accept this suggestion to disqualify any one interested, of the kind I have mentioned. It must be disqualification for candidature to the Legislature of the Centre as well as of a State. Sir, I move:
(Amendment No. 2416 was not moved.) Mr. Mohd. Tahir:
Mr. President, Sir, I would like to move only the latter part of my amendment. Sir, I move: