Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

12. From the overall discussions I do not find any perversity on the findings in issue No. 3 and as per discussions made hereinabove I am of the considered opinion that there is no jurisdictional failure on the part of the learned court below in exercising its jurisdiction under the Act and I do not find any merit in this revision petition. However, keeping in view the nature of business carried out by the defendant/ petitioner it would be proper to give him some time to vacate the tenanted premises before the plaintiff respondent goes for execution of the decree for ejectment of the defendant/ petitioner. Mr. Singh on a specific query submits before this court that three months period may be allowed to the defendant to vacate the tenanted premises. In my considered view the said three months will not be sufficient and accordingly six months time from today is granted to the defendant/ petitioner to vacate the tenanted premises considering the length of possession and the nature of business as on record. However failure on the part of the defendant/ petitioner to vacate the tenanted premises on expiry of the stipulated period the plaintiff/ respondent shall be at liberty to go for execution for ejectment of the defendant/ petitioner by due process of law through the executing court. For the six months period, the defendant/ petitioner shall pay monthly rent of Rs. 3,000/- to the plaintiff/ respondent without any default.