Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

“23.... Howe in our considered view, it will be just unfair to clarify that any amount drawn by such employees either in the basic post(traffic apprentice) or in a promotional post will not be required to be refunded by the employee concern as a consequence of judgement. This position also follows as a necessary corollary from the observation made by this court in para eight of judgement in M.Bhaskar case.” 12.6 Similar view is expressed by the Supreme Court in (2007) 6SCC 180-Babu Lal Jain versus State of MP and by the Madras High Court in 2006 (1) MLJ 143 palavesamuthu vs Tamil Nadu administrative tribunal.