Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

35. It is also pointed out that show cause notice issued in terms of Section 24(1) proviso shall enumerate one or more grounds which may support the conclusions or consequences or which may enable the DISCOMS to put forth their objections and defend. In the absence of affording minimum opportunity, it may not be possible for the DISCOMS to state their objections with respect to the proposed action of OERC. As already pointed out, it is not clear as to whether the proceedings are being initiated by OERC either under Clause (a) or Clause (b) or Clause (c) or Clause (d) of Section 24(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003. It is settled law that the powers of the Commission are derived from the Electricity Act, 2003 and in particular to Section 24 of the Act with respect to the Case on hand and the Commission has to function within the limits and conditions imposed and act according to the said Section 24. It is also settled law that the Regulatory Commission, a quasi-judicial functionary while exercising such quasi-judicial function should assign reasons in support of its conclusion even for passing an Interim Order or direction or to proceed further by issue of notice. Assigning reasons is calculated to prevent unconscious arbitrariness or unfairness in reaching the conclusions. The very attempt to search and set out the reasons will keep the authority alert and minimize the chances of unconscious infiltration of bias or unfairness in its action and conclusion. The fairness inaction is an essentiality which the Regulator has to follow, besides it shall not be arbitrary, nor be polarized, not being over enthusiastic and misguided.