Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

The RFP document of Surat Hazira was issued to 03 shortlisted Bidders who opted to purchase with Bid Due Date as 26.11.2008 which was lastly extended upto 29.12.2008 with the approval of Competent Authority. The Bid Due Date i.e. Date of Financial Bid Opening of this project including other projects was frozen by the Competent Authority of NHAI and were under review of Ministry. Meanwhile the PPPAC vide approval dated 08.12.2008 granted approval of the project with certain condition that Project may be taken up as 4-laning with design capacity of 60000PCU and cost may be rationalized by constructing service lane only when traffic reaches 60000PCUs.

Subsequent to approval of PPPAC vide Ministry of Finance OM dated 08.12.2008, draft CCEA note was submitted to MoRT&H by NHAI vide letter dated 30.12.2008 and CCEA approved the proposal on 05.2.2009.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 3270/2023 Page 13 of 25 By:DINESH CHANDRA Signing Date:10.09.2024

In the appraisal note dated 13.10.2008, it was suggested to re-examine whether both service road and bypasses are necessary to construct in parallel: PPPAC while granting approval in its meeting ·dated 21.11.2008 had advised that cost of the project may be brought down by constructing service road in bypasses when traffic reaches 60,000 PCUs. In compliance to the appraisal note of PPPAC observing that whether both service road parallel to bypasses are necessary, NHAI vide letter dated 14.11.2008 had submitted its reply to MORTH for consideration and approval with the submission that Bypass and service road have not been proposed in parallel; Some stretch - of existing SH, 187 & SH 16.8, is a part of Bardoli-Ichhapore bypass and service road has been provided in built up areas of these SHs; and Service road as proposed in PPP AC proposal is absolutely required as per clause 2.2.1 of 4-laning manual that local traffic in built up areas shall be separated with the provision of service road. Hence Construction of service road only when traffic reaches 60,000 PCU is not justified and construction of service road in some length of bypass was essential due to existence of built area in bypasses.

PPP AC in its 19th meeting held on 21.11.2008 had granted approval for the project with inter-alia condition that the cost of the project may be rationalized by constructing service lane only when traffic reaches a level of 60000 PCU. The record of discussion for aforesaid PPPAC meeting was issued by DOEA vide OM dated 08.12.2008. It is observed that soon after PPPAC meeting, the matter was discussed by Division with DPR consultant and accordingly modification in schedule and reduction in project cost was submitted by DPR Consultant vide their letter dated 26.11.2008 and 0 1.12.2008. Thus, it is observed that during ongoing bidding process, the TPC was not reduced as the Scope of work to construct service road in aggregate length of 71.60 Km was not deleted rather deferred as Concessionaire was required to construct service road in aggregate 71.60 Km at later stage when the traffic reaches 60000 PCUs through Addendum No. 2.