Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

In this regard the learned Judge of the trial Court considered the investigation material in the light of the definitions of the words "Document" (Sec.29 I.P.C), "valuable security" (Sec.30 I.P.C) and "Forgery" (Sec.467 I.P.C) and the cited decision in Ishwarlal Girdharilal Parekh (Supra). Having done such exercise, the learned Judge held thus :

" 25. ...on account of efforts taken by the Investigating Officer to take the blood samples of CCL Vedant was made with an intention to bring on record the correct status of the blood of CCL Vedant and thereby the appropriate C. A. report demonstrating the correct state of intoxication could have been brought on record. Since on account of such exercise a legal right had arisen in favour of the Investigation agency, which could have been enforceable before this court, has been forged. Therefore, on the basis of the present case law, which can have complete application to the facts and circumstances of the present case, it can be inferred that there was forgery of valuable security. As such, the case law would have application to the case at our hand. Accordingly, the submission of Ld. Spl. P. P. Shri. Shishir Hiray regarding correct application of Section 30 and Section 467 of the IPC needs to be upheld.