Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

persons would kill him. The witness deposed that on 01.05.2011 he also lodged the complaint regarding this incident at PS:KNK Marg regarding that DD No.15A was recorded which is Ex.PW1/A having his signature at point X. On the same day he had also given his complaint addressed to SSP Maduri Tamil Naidu which is Ex.PW1/B on which Zero FIR was registered. His son also informed this witness that he has been confined at Thiruvnevelli near Madurai.
24. Insp. Yash was examined as PW-8. He deposed State Vs. Ramesh etc. SC No.58041/16 :: 25 ::
that on 01.05.2011 Vijay Verma came to the police station with complaint Ex. PW-1/B received by Duty Officer vide DD No. 69/B at 10.00 PM. He perused the complaint. Prima facie an offence U/s 364/120-B IPC was made out. Prima facie the place of occurrence fall in the jurisdiction of P.S:Madurai. He made endorsement Ex. PW-8/A and requested duty officer to register Zero FIR. as per the direction of DCP the investigation was entrusted to Insp. Sudesh. No material came out during the cross examination of this witness.
name of C. Vellu Murgan son Sh. V. Chellian. The photocopy of customer application form is proved as Ex.PW15/E. The photocopy of the driving license is Ex.PW15/F. The call detail record of the said mobile number from 29.04.2011 to 07.05.2011 is Ex.PW15/G. The certificate u/s 65B Evidence Act is proved as Ex.PW15/H.
34. Sh. Shishir Malhotra, Nodal officer was examined as PW-16. But he could not bring the record.
35. Inspector Sanjeev Kumar was examined as PW-17. He deposed that on 04.05.2011 he was posted as SHO PS: KNK Marg. On that day he received the fax message Ex.PW17/A from DCP office Outer District. On the same he made his endorsement Ex.PW17/B and got the zero FIR. Zero FIR was already registered on the complaint of complainant which is Ex.PW1/B. The investigation of case was assigned to Incharge AATS Outer District after registration of case FIR No.200/11 as per the directions.
accused persons and that they are demanding rupees two crores for their release. It was also conveyed that if money is not paid they would kill them. PW-1 was at Banglore at that time as has come in his testimony. He returned to Delhi on 01.05.2011 and immediately after reaching there he made the complaint regarding missing of his son. In this regard DD No.15A Ex.PW4/A was recorded. Later on he also gave written complaint Ex.PW1/B on the basis of which initially zero FIR was registered but as the SSP Maduri refused to take any action, the FIR was registered at Delhi and the teams were formed for rescue of the victims from Madurai. The police reached Maduri but in the meanwhile Rohit Verma escaped from the confinement of the accused persons on the pretext of urinating on the intervening night of 4/5 May 2011 and reached Delhi by catching a flight. He talked with Inspector Swadesh Kumar and told him the place where he was confined and thereafter that place i.e. H.No.14B Kariaruppa was raided by the police team. Prosecution has examined HC Balwan Singh PW- 7, SI Sri Bhagwan PW-10 and PW-18 Inspector Swadesh Praskash in this regard. They all three State Vs. Ramesh etc. SC No.58041/16 :: 37 ::