Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
Page 2 of 5
5. The appellant and on behalf of the respondent Shri K C Choudhary,
Assistant General Manager & CPIO, Union Bank of India, Bandra, attended the
hearing through video conference.
5.1. The appellant inter alia submitted that misleading and vague reply was
provided by the respondent. The appellant alleged that as per RBI promotion policy
of 2012, relaxations were applicable only till the year 2016. Hence, she
specifically sought for the justification of Board approval for the relaxation given
in the 3 years Branch Manager Service for the promotion process conducted in
year ending 2017. As per the promotion policy declared by the bank vide staff
circular no: 6362 dated 11.05.2016, based on which the promotion process from
Scale IV to Scale V was declared vide staff circular no: 6506 dated 19.12.2016,
there was no provision even to the Board to give relaxation in Branch Manager
service period. The appellant alleged that the staff circular quoted no. 6685 dated
30.10.2017 was issued subsequently, therefore, the same was not relevant to the
relaxation given in the year ending 2017.