Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

“Learned counsels for the parties jointly submit that, in view of the nature of relief sought in the present petition, it would be appropriate if the Medical Council of India is also impleaded as a party respondent. Accoridngly, at the oral request of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Medical Council of India, through its Secretary is impleaded as respondent No.2. Mr. T. Singhdev, learned counsel, who is present in court has requested to enter appearance on behalf of respondent no.2. Issue notice.
Mr. T. Singhdev, leafrned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no.2.
Learned counsels for the respondents are granted three weeks to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filled within two weeks thereafter.
It is made clear that the diversion of three seats of the all India Quota would remain subject to outcome of the present petition and therefore, candidates who will be allotted the said seats would be accordingly informed.” (emphasis added) It was clearly observed by the High Court that diversion of three seats of All India quota would remain subject to the outcome of the petition, candidates who would be allotted the said seats should be accordingly informed. Thus, the said interim order made it clear that rights of the petitioner were clearly protected under the order and admissions so given as against the seats filled by All India merit list after 10th May, 2018 were subject to ultimate outcome of the said writ application.