Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 22 of drc act in Babita Goyal vs University Of Delhi on 25 February, 2026Matching Fragments
h. Detail of communication received from the old supervisors marking their protest in making change of supervisor in the case of Ms. Gargi Singh. Also provide the action taken report on said communication."
2. The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 10.09.2024 stating as under:-
"(a).(c).(d).(f)&(g). Input provided by the Head (Department of Statistics) contains individual information of students, which is treated as personal information of the students concerned, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest. Disclosure of such personal information is exempt under section 8(1)(j) of the Act. Further, the information provided by the deemed PIO also divulges identities of DRC and BRS members, which cannot be disclosed as per section 8(1)(g) of the Act as disclosure of the information would disclose the identity of the officials concerned, which would endanger their physical safety.