Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ranjitha in Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 5 October, 2020Matching Fragments
4. The issue involved in all these appeals are common in nature, therefore, we decide to adjudicate the batch of appeals by this common judgment.
5. We have considered the oral and written submissions made by Mr. SajanPoovayya, learned senior counsel for APML, Mr. Anand K. Ganesan, learned counsel for MSEDCL, Ms. PratitiRungta, learned counsel for MERC and Ms. Ranjitha Ramachandran, learned counsel for Prayas.
6. Further, pursuant to the directions of this Tribunal in daily order dated 16.06.2020, Adani filed an Affidavit on 18.06.2020 clarifying that:-
7.3 Ms. Ranjitha Ramachandran, learned counsel appearing for Prayas adopted submissions made by learned counsel for MSEDCL. Learned counsel for Prayas additionally submitted that Manoharalal Sharma judgment and the de-allocation letters cannot be considered as Change in Law events since there was no impact on Adani due to the same. Environmental Clearance was rejected much prior to the said events. This is also evident from Adani's conduct since Adani did not even send any change in law notice claiming the said events as change in law.