Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: hash value in Abhilash @ Abhiraj Sudhir Mohanpurkar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 September, 2025Matching Fragments
58. PW13 Vijay Ingale is Government Servant. He has acted as panch to the panchanama of extracting hash value from three DVDs each at seven places. Milind Jahagirdar was another panch. In their presence CCTV footage of seven places were converted into DVDs with the help of laptop. He knows about the hash value, which means that the CCTV footage collected by police and those appearing in the DVD are one and the same. In their presence eight screenshots of the CCTV footage were taken. Police prepared panchanama (Exhibit-122) in their presence. Hash value mentioned in the screenshots is noted down in panchanama. Eight screenshots of hash value were admitted by him to be the same. They are collectively marked as Exhibit- 123/1 to 123/8. He identified the DVD in respect of CCTV footage at Girija Samarth Services (Article- BB/1 to BB/3), Daulatabad Gram Panchayat (Article- CC/1 to CC/3), Vardhan Automobiles (Article- Z/1 to Z/3), Kidzee School (Article- X/1 to X/3), Renukadas Vaidya's house (Article- AA/1 to AA/3), Gajanan Maharaj Temple (Article- EE/1 to EE/3) and Shankar Chest Hospital (Article- II/1 to II/3).
67. PW14 Dr. Rahul Khatavkar, investigating officer, has proved panchanama of downloading CCTV footage and has obtained hash value of the DVDs and prepared it's panchanamas (Exhibits- 123/1 to 123/8). He has forwarded all the DVDs to the Forensic Science Lab, Kalina, Mumbai, on 23/03/2017.
68. PW41 Atul Patil has examined DVDs sent to him and prepared report (Exhibit-218). He has deposed that he received letter sent by Jawahar Nagar Police Station bearing No.823/17, along with the letter police had sent DVR with it's hard disk, seven DVD, reference photographs of the car No.MH-01-BF-6088 and photographs of Wardhan, mobile phone, sim card, memory card etc. He analyzed articles and prepared report as per Exhibit-171. He stated that videos as per the police letter (Exhibit-171) were found in the DVR. He saved the same. The videos were of 27/02/2017, he saved the same. He prepared image frames of those video files and compared the image frames with the reference photographs sent to him by police. The reference photograph of car at page No.5 of Exhibit-218 tallied with the frame image on page No.5. The car found in the video of 27/02/2017 at 20:42:34 Hours is the car as SVH 64 237-19-CrApl.odt shown in reference photograph. The reference photographs sent by police at page Nos.6 to 22 tally with the frame images extracted by him from the videos and DVD. The reference photographs on page Nos.10 to 22 of the car tally with the frame images taken by him from different DVDs which are on page Nos.6 to 22 of the report. He had received black and white DVD. He extracted frame image from the DVD and compared the same with reference photographs and found that the car in black and white DVD and reference photographs on page Nos.20 and 21 tally with each other. Three reference photographs i.e. of accused No.1 Abhilash, witness Sachin and deceased Wardhan were sent to his office. He checked the frame images sent to him through DVD and compared the same with the reference photographs and found that the frame images extracted by him from the DVD and the reference photographs of accused No.1 Abhhilash, witness Sachin and Wardhan tally with each other. He further deposed that the frame image extracted by him from DVR tally with the reference photograph of deceased Wardhan at page No.25. The person who was driving the car as mentioned in frame image at page No.8 tally with reference photograph of accused No.1 at page No.23.