Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

OPINION: Based on the Clinical examination and Urologist, Radiologist, Neurologist and Psychiatrist opinion, the above examined individual may be having erectile dysfunction and his potency status will be below normal.

18. However, on a reading of evidence of P.W.2 and previous statement of the victim girl clearly proved that the accused 5, 6 to 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis  CRL.A.Nos.465 of 2020, 206 & 456 of 2021 have committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl one way or the other. It is impossible for the victim to remember and recollect each and every place, incident and each and every person. The discrepancies and contradictions pointed out by the learned counsel for the accused and the trial court judge for acquitting the accused are not material contradictions and the same which will not go into the root of the case of the prosecution. Even though, the trial judge relied on the document Ex.P67, for acquitting A8, from the evidence of P.W.2, it is clear that two persons committed vaginal penetrative sexual assault on her and the victim girl clearly identified A8 and he also accompanied with other accused A6, A7, A9 A10 and all accused A6 to A10 joined together committed the sexual assault on the victim girl one after another. During that time, two of them had the oral sexual assault and three of them had vaginal sexual assault. Therefore, the findings of the trial court is perverse and there is a compelled circumstance to reverse the findings of the trial court.