Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: protest application in Special Deputy Collector, (L.A.O), ... vs Padala Venkata Ramana on 31 December, 1998Matching Fragments
Land acquired :
0.49 cents Compensation for trees :
Rs. 2.75 lakhs Mango trees (15) (15 year old) :
Rs. 15,000/- each awarded
27. In the statement given before the LAO, it was stated that there were no trees, wells and huts. In the protest application, there is no mention of trees and only land is mentioned. In the claim statement, there was similar assertion as regards cultivation as in OP 57 of 1988.
OP No .61 of l988 Land acquired :
0.33 cents Compensation awarded by Court :
Rs. 2.43 lakhs Compensation awarded for trees :
Rs. 1.50 lakhs Coconut (15) (aged 12 years) :
Rs. 10,000/- per each awarded
28. There was no mention of trees in the protest application. In the statement given before LAO, it was specifically stated that there were no trees, wells and huts. In the claim statement, there was similar assertion as regards cultivation as in OP 57 of 1988.
Land acquired :
0.04 cents (about 192 sq. yds.,) Compensation awarded by Court :
Rs. 98,760/-
Compensation for trees :
Rs. 86,760/-
Coconut trees (2) :
Rs. 10,000/- each Sapota (5) :
Rs. 2,500/- each Gold flower (Sampangi) (5) :
Rs. 10,000/-
Palmyrah (10) :
Rs. 500/-
29. In the protest application and in the statement given before LAO, there is no mention of trees and only land is mentioned.