Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejectment execution in Racchpal Kaur vs Krishna Rani And Etc on 8 August, 2016Matching Fragments
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is wife of Atma Singh, against whom ejectment order has been passed by the authorities under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rent Act') and has attained finality. The demised premises were in fact purchased by Atma Singh vide sale deed dated 11th March, 1983 and after purchasing the plot, he raised construction of the house. This plea was raised by the husband- respondent in the reply to the petition filed under Section 13 of the Rent Act and was discarded by the Court, while allowing his ejectment. The petitioner had filed objections in the execution petition claiming herself to be the owner of demised premises. The executing court without 1 of 2 CR-5019-2016(O&M) -2- recording the evidence regarding the plea raised by the petitioner- objector, dismissed her objections.