Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

36. She had claimed that the invoice dated 18.12.2010 Ex.CW-1/E was forged. She took the plea that there was cutting on the date. Cutting of date does not make it to be forged when cutting of date was "signed" by the executant of invoice i.e. the complainant and particularly when month and year remain intact. This appears to be human error and cannot be interpreted as interpolation or forgery.