Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: weekend in P. Sukanya vs State Bank Of Patiala, Chief Manager on 12 August, 2015Matching Fragments
1. The complainant's father Panneer Selvam encountered a premature death on 7.9.2007 due to Cardiac Arrest, leaving behind the complainant, her mother and elder sister as his legal heirs and she was still in the pubescent stage and her mother with a noble view did not deem it fit and proper to bring to her knowledge about the hardship created by the 1st opposite party thus was ingesting insult to herself.
2. For the sake of convenience she is staying in the hostel attached to PSG Institute, Coimbatore and makes it a point to visit her mother and sister on weekends, and during one such visit to her premise a fortnight ago she noticed the 1st opposite party inspecting the complaint schedule property along with an Advocate Commissioner, upon which the complainant quizzed her mother who revealed as to how the 1st opposite party hoodwinked his father and herself, to go for a loan with an package for insurance cover miserably failed in their contractual obligation by not remitting the one time premium amount of Rs.1,73,003/- to the 2nd opposite party, which is leading to worrisome circumstances, thus constraining the complainant to knock at the doors of this commission for relief. The 1st opposite party took coercive measures by initiating proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and have succeeded in their endeavour the details of which are not traversed into as they are not germane to the above proceedings.