Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: article 239aa in Gajender Singh vs Ryan Internation School And Anr on 25 May, 2026Matching Fragments
47. It is further held in the aforesaid judgment that even if, it is assumed for the sake of arguments that there is any repugnancy between the aforesaid two provisions, by virtue of operation of proviso of Article 239AA(3)(c), Section 10(4A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 being a law made by legislative assembly of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, which was reserved for consideration of the President, having received his assent on 13.07.2003 and Gajender Singh Vs. M/s Ryan International School stands enacted thereafter, would prevail over the Central Legislation. Relevant observations of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in this regard are being reproduced herein below for ready reference:-
29. In view of the above discussion, we are unable to agree with the observations in the impugned order that there was a repugnancy between the two statutory provisions.
30. Even if it could be held that there was a repugnancy between them, by virtue of the operation of the proviso to Article 239AA(3)(c), Section 10(4A) being a law made by the Legislative Assembly of the Government of NCT of Delhi which was reserved for consideration of the President and having received his assent on 13th July, 2003 and stands enacted thereafter, would prevail over the central legislation."