Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Nand Kishore Jha & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 21 June, 2016

Author: Jitendra Mohan Sharma

Bench: Jitendra Mohan Sharma

      Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16424 of 2016 (3) dt.21-06-2016




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     Criminal Miscellaneous No.16424 of 2016
                       Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2015 Thana -MUSAHRI District- MUZAFFARPUR
                   ======================================================
                   1. Nand Kishore Jha Son of Late Badri Narayan Jha
                   2. Indrajeet Jha Son of Nand Kishore Jha
                   Both are Residents of Village - Parayan Bathana, P.S.- Kudhani, District-
                   Muzaffarpur.... .... Petitioners
                                                       Versus
                   1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s      :    Mr. Jyotsna Rani Mishra
                   For the Opposite Party/s      : Mr. Matloob Rab, (App)
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN
                   SHARMA
                   ORAL ORDER

3   21-06-2016

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mushahri P.S. Case No. 209 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are not named in the first information report but as submitted during course of investigation they were arrested on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Suresh Paswan. They were put on test identification parade but they have not been identified by the victim and informant which is evident from paragraph 100 of the case diary. Other co-accused Ratnesh Kumar, Rajeev Kumar and Suresh Paswan have already been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court and as such the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration as they are Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16424 of 2016 (3) dt.21-06-2016 in custody since 16.01.2016 having no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP fairly submits that other three co-accused have been allowed bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Sub Judge III, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushahri P.S. Case No. 209 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/-

  U         T