Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: multi task worker in Poonam Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 10 November, 2022Matching Fragments
Petitioner has filed the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):-
"1. That this Hon'ble Court may kindly please to direct the respondents to award marks to petitioner for indigent certificates (5) marks & Scheduled Tribe Certificate (3) marks which produced before the authority behalf of the petitioner and provided by the authority/concerned panchayat at the time hold interview under Rule 7 of as per framed new policy for the post of Multi Task worker at Government Primary School Pagar, Education Block Satoun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P.
2. That this Hon'ble Court may kindly please to direct the respondents for appointment to the petitioner as Multi Task worker in GPS Pagar. Because presently petitioner is not appointed due to not award (5) five marks to the petitioner for Indigent Certificate for appointment on this post of multi task worker and are favoring respondent no.5 by the respondents.
3. That the respondents may also be directed not to make the appointment of the respondents No.5 due to the fraud certificate produced by the respondents no.5 which appointed by the respondents with highly politically approached based during the pendency of the present petition."
3. Rule-19, provided vide Addendum dated 25th August, 2022, reads as under:-
" ADDENDUM In partial modification of this Department's Notification No. EDN-C-B(1)2/2019 dated 16th July, 2020 (as updated upto 11th March, 2022), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to add "Rule-19 Appellate Authority" in the Part Time Multi Task Workers Policy, 2020 as under:
19. Appellate Authority.