Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: API based PBAS in S.Periandy vs The Union Territory Of Puducherry on 27 April, 2011Matching Fragments
iv)A minimum score in the Academic Performance Indicator (API) based Performance Based Appraisal System (PBAS).
Therefore, the petitioner contended that the said direction issued by the UGC Regulation 2010 should have been followed by the second respondent.
8. The petitioner had applied for the said post. He was directed to appear for the Certificate verification on 26.10.2010. Accordingly, he appeared on 10.11.2010 and produced all the certificates. He was also permitted to attend the viva-voce on the same day. However, the third respondent had not fulfilled the eligibility criteria for selection to the post of Principal as per the UGC Regulations 2010 and he did not have the Ph.D degree as on the last date for application to the said post on 26.02.2010. He had also not fulfilled the criteria provided. But the third respondent was selected by the Committee. While the petitioner was placed in the waiting list in the first position, the third respondent was appointed as the Principal.